ACM Logo  An ACM Publication  |  CONTRIBUTE  |  FOLLOW    

Of web hits and Britney Spears
gauging success in online publishing (and education!)

By Lisa Neal / January 2008

TYPE: OPINION
Print Email
Comments Instapaper

Hits, Web analytics—some days it seems they're all I hear about. To the best of my knowledge, my position at eLearn Magazine is not dependent on how many people read my articles, or open the Web pages (which is really what analytics track). Other publications, however, are starting to measure the value of individual writers based on hits.

Gawker, "the notorious Manhattan media and gossip blog," recently lost many key writers when it implemented a "new compensation system that pays writers according to how many times people view their blog posts rather than only by how many posts they write."

I was particularly struck by Gawker's move because I had just read a John Dvorak column in PC Magazine that suggested the best way to get hits is to write about Britney Spears. I was amused at first but then thought more about the appeal of celebrities. I certainly find that my attention is caught by celebrity journalism (especially in a doctor's waiting room). For example, I just read how Joe Namath recently received his bachelor's degree from the University of Alabama "42 years after he left school to become a professional football player." He completed his degree in five years through Alabama's External Degree program. At a press conference called to spotlight his accomplishment, Namath said, "Without a degree I had a hole in my being." How refreshing to hear a statement like this about the value of education!

To the best of my knowledge, Britney Spears is not involved in any degree-granting programs, online or otherwise (although I understand she recently took a court-ordered parenting class.) However, the mention of her name in my column may dramatically increase hits, especially if I can think of a way to include Jamie Lynn Spears, too. My mention of Joe Namath may help as well, but not as much as the Spears sisters.

At eLearn Magazine, we are concerned about quality in both the ideas and the writing of the material we publish. Measuring hits is useful because of what it indicates about readers' interests, but other measures may be more meaningful—especially direct reader feedback, because that is usually the clearest sign that one of our articles has made a difference in readers' lives. In fact, the same is true when trying to measure student engagement as regards online or traditional courses. Raw data is no match for readers' (or students') comments.

That said, when Britney Spears enrolls in an online program, you'll read about it here first.



Comments

  • There are no comments at this time.

ADDITIONAL READING

    Lisa Neal
  1. "Spot Learning"
  2. When will e-learning reach a tipping point?
  3. Q&A with Saul Carliner
  4. "Deep" thoughts
  5. The stripper and the bogus online degree
  6. Five questions...for Tom Carey
  7. Learner on the Orient Express
  8. Five (or six) questions...for Irene McAra-McWilliam
  9. How to get students to show up and learn
  10. Blended conferences
  11. Predictions for 2002
  12. Learning from e-learning
  13. Q&A with Don Norman
  14. In search of simplicity
  15. Five Questions...for Christopher Dede
  16. Want better courses?
  17. Designing usable, self-paced e-learning courses
  18. Just "DO IT"
  19. Senior service
  20. Formative evaluation
  21. Blogging to learn and learning to blog
  22. Predictions for 2007
  23. Not all the world's a stage
  24. Five questions...for Seb Schmoller
  25. Do distance and location matter in e-learning?
  26. Why do our K-12 schools remain technology-free?
  27. Degrees by mail
  28. The Value of Voice
  29. Predictions for 2006
  30. Five questions...for Shigeru Miyagawi
  31. Five questions...
  32. Five questions...for Larry Prusack
  33. Five questions...for Karl M. Kapp
  34. Music lessons
  35. Learn to apologize for fun and profit
  36. Advertising or education?
  37. Predictions for 2008
  38. Serious games for serious topics
  39. Back to the future
  40. Predictions For 2003
  41. Q&A
  42. Storytelling at a distance
  43. Talk to me
  44. Q&A with Diana Laurillard
  45. Online learning and fun
  46. Everything in moderation
  47. eLearning and fun
  48. The basics of e-learning
  49. Is it live or is it Memorex?
  50. Five Questions... for John Seely Brown
  51. 5 questions... for Richard E. Mayer
  52. My life as a Wikipedian
  53. Five questions...for Elliott Masie
  54. Five questions...for Lynn Johnston
  55. Five questions…for Matt DuPlessie
  56. Do it yourself
  57. Predictions for 2004