- Home
- Articles
- Reviews
- About
- Archives
- Past Issues
- The eLearn Blog
Archives
To leave a comment you must sign in. Please log in or create an ACM Account. Forgot your username or password? |
Create an ACM Account |
In an era where classroom engagement and personalized education are more important than ever, just-in-time teaching (JiTT) emerges as a key strategy for college instructors. This pedagogical approach integrates active learning with the timely use of instructional technology to enhance student understanding and participation [1]. JiTT focuses on creating learning experiences that are tailored to the students' current understanding and needs. It involves short, pre-class assignments that gauge students' knowledge on upcoming topics, allowing instructors to adjust their lessons accordingly. This method not only prepares students for class but also provides instructors with feedback on which areas require more attention.
To effectively implement JiTT in the college classroom, a well-structured approach is crucial. This method revolves around dynamically adapting your teaching based on real-time student feedback and performance, enhancing both engagement and comprehension [1, 2]. (The step-by-step process begins with designing pre-class assignments that gauge students' understanding of upcoming topics. This data is then analyzed to identify areas where students struggle or excel, enabling targeted adjustments in classroom activities. The sequence continues with engaging students through interactive learning during class, further solidifying their grasp of the material. Finally, the cycle concludes with gathering post-class feedback to refine and improve future teaching strategies. Each of these steps plays a vital role in creating an educational environment where learning is both efficient and deeply rooted in students' immediate academic needs and interests.
The following steps provide more detailed information.
Step 1. Design pre-class assignments: Start by identifying the key concepts or learning objectives for your upcoming class. Develop a range of concise, focused assignments tailored to these objectives, such as multiple-choice quizzes, short reflective essays, or specific problem-solving tasks. These should be distributed via digital tools like Google Forms or your institution’s learning management system (LMS), ensuring they include clear instructions and are due before the next class. To enhance critical thinking, include questions that require applying concepts to new scenarios, not just recalling facts.
Step 2. Analyze student submissions: Before your class meets, thoroughly review the submissions to pinpoint common themes and misunderstandings in students’ responses. Leverage your LMS analytics tools to see which questions were most frequently missed and which topics spurred significant discussion. Summarize these insights to determine which topics need more thorough exploration during the upcoming class session.
Step 3. Adjust classroom activities: Modify your lesson plan or lecture based on the analysis to better address the needs you identified. If many students misunderstood a key concept, plan a mini-lecture to clarify it further. Use a variety of instructional strategies, such as peer instruction or small group discussions, to engage students with these challenging topics. Additionally, prepare supplementary resources or alternative explanations for particularly difficult concepts to ensure you can offer immediate clarification during class.
Step 4. Engage in active learning: Design your class time to maximize student interaction and participation. Employ active learning techniques like think-pair-share, breakout groups, or role-playing. Integrate appropriate technologies, such as real-time polling tools to assess understanding or virtual simulations to illustrate practical applications of theoretical concepts. Encourage a collaborative atmosphere by prompting students to discuss and teach one another, which facilitates deeper understanding and retention of the material [3, 4].
Step 5. Close the feedback loop: At the conclusion of each class, implement a quick assessment to gauge the effectiveness of the day's teaching and measure student understanding. This could take the form of a brief quiz, a one-minute paper, or an electronic survey. Solicit direct feedback on which parts of the lesson were most and least helpful through anonymous digital forms. Regularly analyze this feedback to refine your teaching strategies, adjust how content is delivered, and continue tailoring future classes to better meet student needs.
At the start of the class, it is essential to explain the JiTT process to students so they understand how the class will be run, what is expected of them, and what class sessions will look like. JiTT involves pre-class assignments, tailored lessons based on student feedback, and interactive classroom activities. Because this method may differ from traditional teaching approaches, students need a clear understanding of how it will work. An overview of the JiTT process should include:
Implementing JiTT offers a range of advantages that significantly enhance the educational experience [2]. One of the primary benefits is enhanced engagement; students come to class better prepared and are more actively involved in discussions and activities. This heightened engagement is a direct result of tailoring instruction to meet students' specific needs, which not only improves their understanding but also enhances retention of course material. Additionally, JiTT allows for more efficient use of classroom time. By focusing on areas where students require the most support, instructors can optimize class sessions to address these needs effectively. Another critical advantage is the provision of immediate feedback. Both students and instructors benefit from timely responses that inform the ongoing learning process, facilitating continuous improvement throughout the course. Simply put, JiTT creates a dynamic and responsive learning environment that benefits both faculty and students.
While JiTT is a highly effective pedagogical method, it presents some challenges that faculty need to navigate. A significant concern is the aspect of time management; the preparation and analysis of pre-class assignments can be quite time-consuming. To mitigate this, faculty can initially implement JiTT on a smaller scale, perhaps starting with one or two cycles per semester. This approach allows for a manageable introduction to JiTT, providing the opportunity to adjust and scale up as one becomes more comfortable with the workflow.r5
Another challenge lies in the dependency on technology, as JiTT requires students to complete assignments online. This can pose a barrier, particularly for students who may not have reliable access to digital devices or the internet. To address this, faculty should work closely with their institutions to ensure that all students have access to the necessary technology. This might involve leveraging institutional resources, such as lending programs for laptops or tablets, or providing enhanced access to campus Wi-Fi facilities. By proactively addressing these technological needs, faculty can help ensure that all students are able to participate fully in JiTT activities.
While principles of JiTT are often discussed in relation to traditional, face-to-face instruction, JiTT principles can be adapted for asynchronous online courses [5]. This adaptation requires a thoughtful approach to ensure the key principles of timely feedback and course content adaptation are preserved even without real-time interactions. Here are several strategies to implement JiTT effectively in an asynchronous setting:
By incorporating these strategies, JiTT can be effectively adapted for asynchronous online courses, ensuring that students remain engaged and receive personalized educational experiences even in a non-traditional learning environment.
JiTT is a powerful method for adapting to the dynamic needs of today’s college students. By following this practical guide, faculty can implement JiTT strategies that not only boost student engagement and learning outcomes but also enhance the overall educational experience. As you integrate JiTT into your teaching practices, remember the key is flexibility and responsiveness to your students' learning needs [1].
[1] Simkins, S. and Maier, M. H. Just-in-Time Teaching: Across the Disciplines, and Across the Academy. Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA, 2010.
[2] Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition. The National Academies Press, 2000.
[3] Crouch, C. H., and Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics 69, 9 (2001), 970.
[4] Watkins, J. and Mazur, E. Just-in-time teaching and peer instruction. In S. P. Simkins and M. H. Maier (Eds.), Just-in-Time Teaching Across the Disciplines, and Across the Academy. Stylus Publishing, Sterling, VA, 2010, 39–62.
[5] Novak, G. M., Patterson, E. T., Gavrin, A. D., and Christian, W. Just-in-Time Teaching: Blending Active Learning with Web Technology. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1999.
Jean Mandernach, Ph.D. is Executive Director of the Center for Innovation in Research on Teaching at Grand Canyon University. Her research focuses on enhancing student learning experiences in the online classroom through innovative instructional and assessment strategies. She explores strategies for integrating efficient online instruction in a manner that maximizes student learning, satisfaction, and engagement. In addition, she has interests in artificial intelligence, innovative faculty development and evaluation models, teaching and learning analytics, emergent instructional technology, and faculty workload considerations. Jean is an active researcher, author, presenter, and consultant in the field of online education.
© Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM. 1535-394X/2025/03-3686810 $15.00 https://doi.org/10.1145/3722563.3686810
To leave a comment you must sign in. |
Create an ACM Account. |