ACM Logo  An ACM Publication  |  CONTRIBUTE  |  FOLLOW    

My life as a Wikipedian

By Lisa Neal / March 2007

TYPE: OPINION
Print Email
Comments Instapaper

In her reflections on procrastination for eLearn Magazine, Claire Gill draws a clear distinction between issues associated with completing individual versus group projects. Group projects are different, she writes, because a resulting site might "suffer from my missing content." I took that notion to heart and decided that I could no longer allow the world to suffer from my missing content.

I had noticed that Wikipedia did not have an entry on Online Health Communities and resolved to write one. As perhaps the only person in the world teaching a course on this topic (at Tufts University School of Medicine), I am certainly qualified to write on it. I really didn't know what to expect: Would my content expertise be enough? That didn't seem likely. But then, Wikipedia is the place where "anyone" can contribute-or was, before those recent, high-profile instances of vandalism forced Wikipedia to tighten rules for contributors. As a result, I spent weeks trying to keep my entry posted despite its seemingly automatic (and less than friendly) "flagged for deletion" status.

Even before Wikipedia's recent problems, there was no shortage of related encyclopedic controversy. "Is it accurate?" ask the site's critics. But some say that Wikipedia's negative press derives in part from the challenges it represents to traditional media and old-world "official" sources. A peer-review comparison of Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica reported in Nature found an average of 2.92 mistakes per article for Britannica, and 3.86 for Wikipedia. Overall, Wikipedia has earned a phenomenal reputation, especially for how current it stays, and for how widely it is used as a reference.

The new rules for contributors require that anyone creating or editing an entry must register so that all changes can be tracked and identified. But in an effort to further protect Wikipedia's integrity-and prevent problems like "vanity pages"-all new entries are (apparently) tagged for removal. I immediately felt like I was sparring with unseen demons. Were they bots or real people? And what could I do about it?

I added a justification, and tried to "wikify" the entry, which involved adding references and reformatting the text. Next I enlisted assistance: I contacted one of the many Wikipedia volunteers, called Wikipedians, for help with formatting, and I contacted my students to review my entry. I asked them to add to it since they were now very knowledgeable (grades, however, were already in; I should have asked earlier). Even though the deletion flag was eventually removed, I nervously checked almost every day. Thankfully, the page is still there.

What did I learn? Volunteer policing is highly effective; volunteers can be very helpful to "newbies"; and as the creator of a page I am now a Wikipedian. My friends are very impressed that I created a new entry, but none is following in my footsteps even though TIME Magazine's named "you" as Person of the Year .

I wonder if Encyclopedia Britannica wants my help now.



Comments

  • There are no comments at this time.

ADDITIONAL READING

    Lisa Neal
  1. Designing usable, self-paced e-learning courses
  2. Just "DO IT"
  3. Senior service
  4. Formative evaluation
  5. Blogging to learn and learning to blog
  6. Predictions for 2007
  7. Not all the world's a stage
  8. Five questions...for Seb Schmoller
  9. Do distance and location matter in e-learning?
  10. Why do our K-12 schools remain technology-free?
  11. Degrees by mail
  12. The Value of Voice
  13. Predictions for 2006
  14. Five questions...for Shigeru Miyagawi
  15. Five questions...
  16. Five questions...for Larry Prusack
  17. Five questions...for Karl M. Kapp
  18. Music lessons
  19. Learn to apologize for fun and profit
  20. Advertising or education?
  21. Of web hits and Britney Spears
  22. Predictions for 2008
  23. Serious games for serious topics
  24. Back to the future
  25. Predictions For 2003
  26. Q&A
  27. Storytelling at a distance
  28. Talk to me
  29. Q&A with Diana Laurillard
  30. Online learning and fun
  31. Everything in moderation
  32. eLearning and fun
  33. The basics of e-learning
  34. Is it live or is it Memorex?
  35. Five Questions... for John Seely Brown
  36. 5 questions... for Richard E. Mayer
  37. Five questions...for Elliott Masie
  38. Five questions...for Lynn Johnston
  39. Five questions…for Matt DuPlessie
  40. Do it yourself
  41. Predictions for 2004
  42. "Spot Learning"
  43. When will e-learning reach a tipping point?
  44. Q&A with Saul Carliner
  45. "Deep" thoughts
  46. The stripper and the bogus online degree
  47. Five questions...for Tom Carey
  48. Learner on the Orient Express
  49. Five (or six) questions...for Irene McAra-McWilliam
  50. How to get students to show up and learn
  51. Blended conferences
  52. Predictions for 2002
  53. Learning from e-learning
  54. Q&A with Don Norman
  55. In search of simplicity
  56. Five Questions...for Christopher Dede
  57. Want better courses?