ACM Logo  An ACM Publication  |  CONTRIBUTE  |  FOLLOW    

Five questions...
for Lance Dublin

By Lisa Neal / October 2006

TYPE: INTERVIEW
Print Email
Comments Instapaper

Lance Dublin was founder of Antioch University/West, one of the first accredited online universities. He later created consultancy The Dublin Group, and currently works as an independent management consultant.

Lisa Neal: Which recent innovations in e-learning do you believe have the most potential and why?

Lance Dublin: Actually we haven't seen, in my opinion, much innovation in e-learning recently. We've seen improvements that have been labeled as innovations.

Blended learning and rapid e-learning are both good examples of this. Blended learning has been around since the first book was introduced in a classroom. The difference is we are now able to blend many more learning approaches and tools, many of them technology-based. And the same with rapid e-learning: One could well argue that every PowerPoint presentation is an example of rapid e-learning to the person who created it. But again, now we are adding tools and templates to make these presentations more effective and look more like learning events.

LN: What do you see as the potential of technologies for rapid e-learning, social networking, blogging, and so on for corporate e-learning?

LD: First, I don't think rapid e-learning belongs in this list as it's an approach to design and development rather than a technology. The technologies with the most potential impact I feel are those categorized as Web 2.0 (i.e., social networking, blogs and wikis, etc.) and the seamless integration in Web 2.0 of video, audio, and text. The greatest change in corporate learning will come about not because of the technologies, but because of the learners! As this new generation of learners comes of age in the working world they will force us to re-formulate what corporate learning is and how it is delivered. We will be forced to move from a linear, event-driven mind-set to a collaborative, learning-at-the-speed-of-work reality.

LN: Why do you emphasize the importance of on-the-job performance and what can an organization do that will have the greatest positive impact in that area?

LD: I stress on-the-job performance because in an organization that is the true "bottom-line." Training of any type is just an event. Learning is a process. But, performance—the ability to do something—must be the result. With this in mind, organizations should spend much more time looking at the factors that drive on-the-job performance and a lot less on evaluating the events. Unfortunately, there is no single factor that always has the most impact.

LN: Do you believe that personalized learning paths will ever become commonplace as part of corporate e-learning, and why or why not?

LD: Yes, I believe they will. But probably not in the way you're thinking. They will look more like a personal MySpace for learning than a list of activities. And, again, this will happen because the learners will expect it. Imagine going to work today and being told you only get a dial phone at your desk. You would think your employer was crazy. Well, the next generation of workers will feel the same way if they are not able to incorporate all of the aspects of Web 2.0 into their jobs as they are doing into their lives: text messaging, social networking, blogging and video blogging, wikis—all at their fingertips—24/7/365.

LN: How can corporate culture and national culture best be accommodated online and do you have any examples of successful approaches?

LD: Hmm...This is a much tougher question. Neither corporate culture nor national culture is really something you "accommodate" online. How corporations or countries end up integrating online technologies into everyday life and work will define the culture. I just don't think it is something you can plan for!



Comments

  • There are no comments at this time.

ADDITIONAL READING

    Lisa Neal
  1. Predictions For 2003
  2. "Spot Learning"
  3. Q&A with Saul Carliner
  4. When will e-learning reach a tipping point?
  5. Online learning and fun
  6. Five questions…for Matt DuPlessie
  7. Back to the future
  8. Serious games for serious topics
  9. Five (or six) questions...for Irene McAra-McWilliam
  10. Learner on the Orient Express
  11. In search of simplicity
  12. eLearning and fun
  13. Everything in moderation
  14. The basics of e-learning
  15. Is it live or is it Memorex?
  16. The Value of Voice
  17. Predictions for 2006
  18. Five Questions...for Christopher Dede
  19. Five Questions... for John Seely Brown
  20. Five questions...for Shigeru Miyagawi
  21. "Deep" thoughts
  22. 5 questions... for Richard E. Mayer
  23. How to get students to show up and learn
  24. Q&A
  25. Blended conferences
  26. Designing usable, self-paced e-learning courses
  27. Want better courses?
  28. Just "DO IT"
  29. Formative evaluation
  30. Senior service
  31. Blogging to learn and learning to blog
  32. My life as a Wikipedian
  33. Five questions...for Elliott Masie
  34. The stripper and the bogus online degree
  35. Five questions...for Lynn Johnston
  36. Five questions...for Tom Carey
  37. Not all the world's a stage
  38. Five questions...for Karl M. Kapp
  39. Five questions...for Larry Prusack
  40. Five questions...for Seb Schmoller
  41. Do distance and location matter in e-learning?
  42. Why do our K-12 schools remain technology-free?
  43. Music lessons
  44. Learn to apologize for fun and profit
  45. Of web hits and Britney Spears
  46. Advertising or education?
  47. Predictions for 2002
  48. Learning from e-learning
  49. Storytelling at a distance
  50. Q&A with Don Norman
  51. Talk to me
  52. Q&A with Diana Laurillard
  53. Do it yourself
  54. Degrees by mail
  55. Predictions for 2004